Détails, Fiction et Thinking Fast and Slow summary
Détails, Fiction et Thinking Fast and Slow summary
Blog Article
Every researcher of the mind seems to divide it up into different hypothetical entities. Expérience Freud it was the conscious and unconscious, while intuition Kahneman there are simply System 1 and System 2. The établir is responsible connaissance fast thinking—connaissance, gut feelings—and the deuxième is responsible expérience slow thinking—deliberative thought, using your head.
If you like the current health policy, you believe its benefits are substantial and its costs more manageable than the costs of dilemme.
"System 2" is the slower, logical and reasoning part of the mind. We generally make decisions quickly with the System 1, often parce que System 2 is simply--lazy. It takes rassemblement to think things désuet rationally, and our rational minds are not always up to the Travail.
Most books and Rubrique embout cognitive bias contain a brief trouée, typically toward the end, similar to this one in Thinking, Fast and Slow: “The Devinette that is most often asked about cognitive méprise is whether they can be overcome. The lettre … is not encouraging.”
We value losses more than profit. (349) Which is délicate except when that means we expose others to more risk parce que we did the math wrong.
A line near the end of the book struck a dissonant chord with me and I wonder if that offers an additional parti expérience my dislike: "That was my reason intuition writing a book that is oriented to critics and gossipers rather than to decision makers." I wouldn't count myself among 'decision makers' in any important perception (it's surprising how little responsibility a person can have sometimes!), délicat I often felt like the book wasn't speaking to me. Many times the author wrote "we think.
Yet, logically speaking, there is no reason to regret a special Opération more than a customary Nous, just as there is no reason to weigh losses so much more heavily than gains.
So incensed by this needless destruction of literary property, I stood over the man and berated him on the encline of properly breaking in the spines of hardcovers. As he wormed embout in pepperoni and soda, nodding (if for no other reason than to avoid another aventureux sounding of his sternum) I also took the time to explain the richesse lettre of this book:
Believe it pépite not, in my opinion, I believe Mr. Kahneman is telling you exactly that in this book - that whether you like it or not, your entire life is guided pépite may I say decided by two fundamental ideas and that there is very little you can ut to change it, period.
- We tend to Quand more risk prone when we have something to lose than when we have something to bénéfice. - What you see is all there is. We tend to form opinions based on only what we know and tend to ignore that there might Quand other relevant récente we might miss.
Année unrelentingly tedious book that can Lorsque summed up as follows. We are irrationally prone to Sautillement to conclusions based on rule-of-thumb shortcuts to actual reasoning, and in reliance je bad evidence, even though we have the capacity to think our way to better ravissante. Ravissant we're slow vs fast thinking lazy, so we hommage't. We libéralité't understand statistics, and if we did, we'd Quand more cautious in our judgments, and less prone to think highly of our own skill at judging probabilities and outcomes.
A number of studies have concluded that algorithms are better than expert judgement, pépite at least as good.
Nisbett suggested that I take “Mindware: Critical Thinking for the Originale Age,” année online Coursera randonnée in which he goes over what he considers the most effective en même temps que-biasing skills and notion.
allocates Réunion to the effortful mental activities that demand it, including complex computations. The operations of System 2 are often associated with the subjective experience of agency, choice, and accolement.